Pass Guaranteed 2024 Updated Juniper JN0-664: Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Valid Braindumps Pdf

Tags: JN0-664 Valid Braindumps Pdf, Standard JN0-664 Answers, Dumps JN0-664 Torrent, JN0-664 Test Vce Free, JN0-664 Certified

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of GetValidTest JN0-664 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1geVf-bCd1R4zzSSjt6H5KL0XVr7v-bO2

GetValidTest offers a complete Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) practice questions in PDF format. This Juniper JN0-664 test questions pdf file format is simple to use and can be accessed from any device, including a desktop, tablet, laptop, Mac, or smartphone. No matter where you are, you can learn on the go. The PDF version of the Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) exam questions is also readily printable, allowing you to keep tangible copies of the Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) questions with you at all times.

Juniper JN0-664 exam, also known as the Service Provider Professional exam, is a certification exam designed for experienced networking professionals seeking to validate their knowledge and skills in advanced routing technologies, security, and service provider operations. JN0-664 Exam is intended for professionals who have already achieved Juniper's Service Provider Routing and Switching Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification and have extensive experience in designing, implementing, and troubleshooting complex service provider networks.

>> JN0-664 Valid Braindumps Pdf <<

High-quality JN0-664 Valid Braindumps Pdf & Perfect Standard JN0-664 Answers & Free PDF Dumps JN0-664 Torrent

The Juniper JN0-664 certification exam is one of the hottest certifications in the market. This Juniper JN0-664 exam offers a great opportunity to learn new in-demand skills and upgrade your knowledge level. By doing this successful JN0-664 Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) exam candidates can gain several personal and professional benefits.

Earning the JN0-664 certification demonstrates to employers and peers that the candidate has a high level of expertise in service provider routing technologies. It is also a prerequisite for the Juniper Networks Certified Internet Expert (JNCIE-SP) certification, which is the highest level of certification offered in this field. With the JN0-664 certification, candidates can advance their careers and take on more challenging roles in service provider network design, implementation, and management.

To pass the Juniper JN0-664 exam, candidates must demonstrate their ability to configure and troubleshoot Juniper Networks' service provider routing and switching technologies, including the Junos OS, BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, MPLS, Layer 2 VPNs, Layer 3 VPNs, and multicast. Candidates must also be able to analyze network traffic and performance, and identify and resolve issues related to security, QoS, and network services. With the Juniper JN0-664 Certification, IT professionals can demonstrate their expertise in service provider networking and advance their careers in this field.

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Sample Questions (Q67-Q72):

NEW QUESTION # 67
Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.
What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

A. Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables
B. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
C. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
D. Add the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables.

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
the default behavior for iBGP is to propagate EBGP-learned prefixes without changing the next-hop. This can cause issues if the next-hop is not reachable via the IGP. One solution is to use the next-hop self command on R4, which will change the next-hop attribute to its own loopback address. This way, R5 can reach the next-hop via the IGP and install the route in its routing table.
Another solution is to add the external interface prefix (120.0.4.16/30) to the IGP routing tables of R4 and R5.
This will also make the next-hop reachable via the IGP and allow R5 to use the route. According to 2, this is a possible workaround for a pure IP network, but it may not work well for an MPLS network.
The reason why the route is being hidden is that R5 cannot reach the BGP next hop 10.0.0.1, which is the address of R1. R5 does not have a route to 10.0.0.0/24 in its routing table, and neither does R4. Therefore, R5 cannot resolve the BGP next hop and marks the route as hidden.
There are two solutions that will solve this problem:
* Option A: On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy. This way, R5 will receive the route with a next hop of 172.16.1.2, which is reachable via the IGP. This solution is also known as next-hop-self1.
* Option B: Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables. This way, R4 and R5 will learn a route to 10.0.0.0/24 via the IGP and be able to resolve the BGP next hop. This solution is also known as recursive lookup2.
Option C is not correct because adding the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables will not help R5 reach the BGP next hop 10.0.0.1.
Option D is not correct because changing the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 on R4 will not help R5 either, since R5 does not have a route to 172.16.1.1 in its routing table.
References: 1: Configuring Next-Hop-Self for IBGP Peers 2: Understanding Recursive Lookup

NEW QUESTION # 68
You are configuring schedulers to define the class-of-service properties of output queues. You want to control packet drops during periods of congestion.
In this scenario, which CoS configuration parameter would be used to accomplish this task?

A. drop profile
B. buffer size
C. priority
D. shaping rate

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 69
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true?

A. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will only be shared if BGP is configured in the routing instance
B. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the vrf-table-label parameter is configured.
C. The 10.101.1 0/24 route will be shared if there are other VRFs that use the same route target community
D. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the auto-export parameter is configured

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
The auto-export parameter is a routing option that allows a routing instance to share routes with other routing instances or the master routing table. The auto-export parameter automatically exports routes from one routing instance to another based on the route target communities attached to the routes. In this scenario, the
10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the auto-export parameter is configured under [edit routing-options] hierarchy level.

NEW QUESTION # 70
Exhibit

A network designer would like to create a summary route as shown in the exhibit, but the configuration is not working.
Which three configuration changes will create a summary route? (Choose three.)

A. delete policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes from route-filter 2001: db9 :a: fa00 : :/6l longer
B. set policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes then reject
C. set policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes from route-filter 2001:db9:a:faOO::/61 exact
D. set protocols isis import summary-v6
E. delete protocols isis export summary-v6

Answer: A,C,E

Explanation:
To create a summary route for IS-IS, you need to configure a policy statement that matches the prefixes to be summarized and sets the next-hop to discard. You also need to configure a summary-address statement under the IS-IS protocol hierarchy that references the policy statement. In this case, the policy statement leak-v6 is trying to match the prefix 2001:db9:a:fa00::/61 exactly, but this prefix is not advertised by any router in the network. Therefore, no summary route is created. To fix this, you need to delete the longer keyword from the route-filter term and change the prefix length to /61 exact. This will match any prefix that falls within the /61 range. You also need to delete the export statement under protocols isis, because this will export all routes that match the policy statement to other IS-IS routers, which is not desired for a summary route.

NEW QUESTION # 71
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?

A. The route-distinguisher configuration will allow overlapping routes to be shared between CE-1 and CE-2.
B. The vrf-target configuration will allow routes to be shared between CE-1 and CE-2.
C. The vrf-target configuration will stop routes from being shared between CE-1 and CE-2.
D. The route-diatinguisher configuration will stop routes from being shared between CE-1 and CE-2.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The route distinguisher (RD) is a BGP attribute that is used to create unique VPN IPv4 prefixes for each VPN in an MPLS network. The RD is a 64-bit value that consists of two parts: an administrator field and an assigned number field. The administrator field can be an AS number or an IP address, and the assigned number field can be any arbitrary value chosen by the administrator. The RD is prepended to the IPv4 prefix to create a VPN IPv4 prefix that can be advertised across the MPLS network without causing any overlap or conflict with other VPNs. In this question, we have two PE routers (PE-1 and PE-2) that are connected to two CE devices (CE-1 and CE-2) respectively. PE-1 and PE-2 are configured with VRFs named Customer-A and Customer-B respectively.

NEW QUESTION # 72
......

Standard JN0-664 Answers: https://www.getvalidtest.com/JN0-664-exam.html

P.S. Free & New JN0-664 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by GetValidTest: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1geVf-bCd1R4zzSSjt6H5KL0XVr7v-bO2